|
HIGHLIGHTS
For more than thirty years, the
Windsor-Bloomfield Sanitary Landfill has served the
solid waste disposal needs of the towns of Windsor and
Bloomfield. Over that period of time, it has evolved
from a facility that handled basic disposal needs to one
that currently manages the disposal of many different
materials.
In February of 2004,
the Town Council approved the design for the final
landform that it felt presented the best environmental
and fiscal options to the residents for the towns of
Windsor and Bloomfield. This landform allows for the
post-closure uses that were identified by the Landfill
Steering Committee and has been incorporated into the
final closure plan that has been submitted to the State
Department of Environmental Protection for their
approval.
In March 2006, the
Windsor Town Council determined that the last receipt of
waste at the Landfill will be when it reaches current
permitted elevations as provided by the designed
landform. By remaining open until the permitted
elevations are reached, it is projected there will be
adequate retained earnings on-hand plus interest income
over 30 years, under present assumptions, to provide
sufficient funding for closure and post-closure
activities.
Revenues for FY 06
were lower than budgeted for two primary reasons: 1)
tonnage of municipal solid waste (MSW) from Windsor was
less; and 2) waste from the spot market was lower. It
is believed that both of these reasons are the result of
the enforcement of the regional waste disposal contracts
by CRRA with the area waste haulers. Solid waste that
had been previously delivered to the Landfill by area
haulers from towns that have disposal contracts with
CRRA is now being delivered to the regional resource
recovery facility in Hartford. This has the effect of
lowering tonnage delivered to the Landfill and reducing
revenues to the Enterprise Fund.
Further, the
difference in the tipping fee for MSW between the CRRA
facility in Hartford and the Landfill has lessened over
the past year. In addition, the tipping fee for CRRA
will be reduced from $70/ton to $69/ton as of July
2006. As a result, it is recommended that the Landfill
not increase its tipping fee for MSW for the next year.
Therefore, the tip fee will remain at $66/ton, which is
within 95% of CRRA’s rate.
Revenues from
contaminated soil increased for FY 06 because of the
receipt of soil from several sites where the level of
contamination was of an amount that was acceptable for
disposal at the Landfill. Revenue from this source is
highly variable from year to year. It is contingent upon
the number of sites cleaned up, the amount of
contamination at the sites, as well as whether the soil
can be disposed at the Landfill.
Interest earnings on
the Enterprise Fund balance have increased for FY 06,
and are estimated to continue at this higher level for
FY 07. This is the result of higher interest rates, and
increasing fund balance.
Total operating
expenses are fairly stable from FY 06 to FY 07.
However, there are changes in the various line items.
In Personal Services, costs are anticipated to be higher
in FY 07 because of contractual increases and higher
health insurance costs. Capital Outlay expenses will be
lower as additional equipment will not be acquired as
the Landfill nears the date of the last receipt of
waste. However, more funding is being budgeted in
Maintenance and Repairs in order to maintain the
equipment already in use at the Landfill. Energy &
Utility costs are higher for FY 06 and are budgeted to
be higher in FY 07 because of the increased costs for
diesel fuel for the equipment. Some of the fund balance
will be used to pay the costs of a small expansion to
the landfill gas collection system. The system will be
expanded into areas that have been filled to approximate
final elevations. This will include the installation of
a horizontal collector along a part of the south edge of
the Landfill.
Staff continues to
identify and attract the additional tonnage needed to
reach proper final elevations, as well as meet the
financial obligations associated with site closure and
post-closure.
|